![]() I can’t guarantee it’s the same case for Spanish though but it might be. The Lingodeer app is somewhat of a Duolingo derivative but with better explanations, far better audio and various other features for a handful of languages. ![]() I’ve completed the Japanese Lingodeer course a few years ago and since have not gotten any updates to their content, and from what I’m seeing now as I learn Korean, Duolingo has more content in store for me than Lingodeer. While this is a fair comparison, I think it puts a little too much focus on grammar. Duolingo is superior in the amount of content it provides and continues to provide as they add more to each language. The LingoDeer website compares learning a language without grammar to building a house without a blueprint. Visit Duolingo LingoDeer Price: Subscriptions start at 11.99/month and go up to 55.99 for a year. (I have to qualify that I’m using mobile though because I previously read a comment in this subreddit where Duolingo on desktop or on the web provides better explanations than its mobile counterpart but I prefer to use it on mobile) It isn’t the best for Asian languages, and there are better apps for more serious learners or those that want better communication practice, but Duolingo is a stellar option in the realm of free and easy language apps. Lingodeer is superior in lesson structure and method in that it gives detailed explanations for vocabulary and grammar ![]() ![]() Im currently using both Duolingo (for Spanish, Japanese and Korean) and Lingodeer (for Japanese and Korean) on mobile, and based on comparing the two apps for Japanese and Korean: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |